Unfortunately, I think the idea that forced labor = slavery is not a concept that pushes the limits of anyone's mental faculties, and thus ignorance is not a valid excuse. Instead, I believe the problem is one of conscience. If those who demand my labor under the threat of imprisonment were to objectively evaluate their actions in light of this simple truth, the result would be such an extreme level of cognitive dissonance that a change in behavior would be unavoidable.
As Stefan Molyneux has pointed out, once a behavior is recognized as evil, it ceases to continue. Evil can only flourish when that which is evil is presented as that which is good. And what facilitates the illusion that juxtaposes evil and good? Language.
Think of the worst atrocities that you can recall from human history or your own personal life? How did those who perpetrated such deeds describe their actions? Did those who called themselves the American government advocate an unparalleled slaughter of the brown-skinned indigenous peoples who lived on the land they wanted? Of course not. Instead they spoke of "Manifest Destiny." Sounds glorious, right? Well, apparently it was an effective enough illusion that the murder of millions of people was passed off as the righteous enactment of a loving God's will.
Sadly, the mass extermination that took place within "America's" borders gets quickly glossed over in favor of horrors for which people who flew a different flag can be blamed. Most frequently the Nazis. If you've always thought the Nazi Holocaust was worse than anything "America" has done, think again, or redefine worse so as not to include the possibility of multiple times more people dead.
Independent research has shown death totals between "10 million and 114 million indians (sic) as a direct result of US actions. Please note that Nazi Holocaust estimates are between 6 and 11 million; thereby making the Nazi Holocaust the 2nd largest mass murder of a class of people in history." Neither Hitler's minions, nor those who committed genocide under the banner of the American Flag, were able to do so while plainly stating their actions. One group had advocated a "Final Solution," and another carried out their "manifest destiny," both sound like something any good person would want, and yet both resulted in the deaths of millions of people.
The atrocities carried out under the banner of the swastika have likely forever designated that emblem as a symbol of the worst evil. Honestly, I've never encountered a person that said, "Yes, the Holocaust was horrible, but look at all the good things the Nazis did. The roads were improved, the garbage was taken away, and for a while, national defense was at an all-time high."
In contrast, only a few days ago, I encountered hundreds of individuals who were waving the banner under which a different genocide was committed. With a few of these people, I did engage in conversation, and yet they maintained that whatever travesties were committed by those who used the "stars and stripes" as their symbol, they were "proud to be an American."
Are you?
I have done things I am not proud of yet I am proud to be who I am. I know you are not proud of your involvement in the military currently, but I would guess you are proud of who you are. Why is it wrong to be proud of who we are or where we live despite the flaws in either?
ReplyDeleteI think such pride is a good thing, but it should only be had (or better said, restored) after the individual or nation that has done things they are not proud of owns up to those actions and honestly deals with them in a moral and just manner (whether they are forced to or not). I could be a German citizen today and live in that nation proud of my heritage and nationality because of the heavy price paid by my ancestors for the atrocities they committed (or tacitly permitted) during the Holocaust. Yes, it is true that there could never be a punishment really to fit that crime, but Germany was firebombed to hell by the Allies, divided, under Communist rule, and had the Nuremberg Trials to repent of and deal justly with their national sins. Today they are much better for it, as Germany is (for the first time in their history I might add) a peace-loving nation in which it is a crime to deny the Holocaust and even fly a Nazi flag, and in which it would be inconceivable that such a crime against humanity could ever be perpetrated again. The U.S. government, however, continues to perpetrate crimes against humanity and it can be little wonder why that is. In what manner, really, has the United States' genocide of native peoples ever really been owned up to by our government? There were no Wounded Knee Trials. We paid no heavy price for our holocaust - we actually benefited from it greatly through national expansion. And today we glorify the concept of Manifest Destiny in our history books and give those Native Americans that remain reservations, casinos, and sports team mascots thinking that somehow makes up for it.
ReplyDeleteMatt Lakemacher